It was the British creator, H.G. Wells, that coined the expression: “The conflict that may finish conflict” to explain World Warfare One, which had damaged out in Europe in September 1914. Wells believed the battle would create a brand new world order that might make future battle inconceivable.

It could achieve this, Wells believed, by crushing the militarism of Germany beneath the Kaiser and its allies, the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires. The Allies – Nice Britain, France, and Russia – had been, Wells wrote, not solely troopers in a conflict however “crusaders towards conflict”.

“There shall be no extra Kaisers […]. We’re resolved. That foolery shall finish! It’s the final conflict.”

Wells’ perception was that the militarisation of Europe firstly of the 20th century, and significantly the manufacture of heavy armaments and fashionable weapons, had been pioneered by Germany and had unfold outwards, forcing Europe as a complete down the identical path.

He was making the argument at a time when many in Britain didn’t consider that the nation ought to be part of France and Russia in combating Germany and Austria-Hungary within the conflict, sparked by the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo by a Bosnian Serb nationalist.

‘The chance for revenge’

Wells first wrote the phrase in August 1914 and inside weeks it had turn out to be a mantra. However whereas in 1914 its sentiment was optimistic – optimistic, even – by 1918 it was determined. Europe was in ruins, thousands and thousands had been useless. It needed to be the final conflict as a result of Europe couldn’t have one other.

World Warfare One was the top of various issues: It led to the collapse of a minimum of 4 empires. The Weimar Republic changed the German Kaiser, the Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires fell, and in 1917 the Bolsheviks overthrew Tsar Nicholas II.

However the Europe that got here subsequent was actually not the brand new social order that Wells had hoped to see – and it was not the top of conflict. Simply 15 years later, Adolf Hitler grew to become Germany’s chancellor and Europe was once more on the trail to a brutal and epoch-defining battle.

Even in 1914, there have been those that didn’t approve of Wells’ prediction. Thinker Bertrand Russell argued, in an open letter to Wells revealed in a British journal, that even when Germany was defeated: “Why ought to Germany not wait […] for the chance of revenge?”

Russell stated that the one strategy to make WW1 the “conflict to finish conflict” could be a brand new period of leaders that had been fairly completely different from people who had taken Europe into conflict, and – crucially, as issues would prove – the avoidance of “insupportable humiliation for the vanquished”.

Whereas the top of WW1 introduced a brand new period of leaders to various European nations, they’d not be the “males with [different] traditions” that Russell foresaw, and the humiliation of the Versaille Treaty that Germany signed in 1918 would kind a centrepiece to Hitler’s Nazi rhetoric.

Wells lived till 1946 and so witnessed the rise of fascism and WW2, and blamed the punitive settlement of the First World Warfare for the onset of the second. He argued that Germans supported Hitler as a result of they feared a repeat of the humiliation of Versailles.

He continued to advocate for a brand new world order, together with in his 1940 e book Rights of Man, which referred to as for a world authorities that might defend the person no matter intercourse, color or creed. It has been credited as the inspiration of the Common Declaration of Human Rights.

‘Thoughts on the Finish of its Tether’

However the man thought-about the daddy of science fiction was not an optimist. His ultimate e book, Thoughts on the Finish of its Tether, which he wrote on the age of 78, speculated that mankind’s time on earth was over, and that it will quickly get replaced by a extra technologically-advanced species.

Within the years since Wells’ loss of life, conflict has adopted conflict in Europe and past, from the Second World Warfare to Vietnam, from Bosnia to Iraq to Afghanistan to Syria. In the meantime, the brand new world order that he predicted – and lobbied for – is arguably as distant now because it was then.

Writing over a century in the past, Russell wrote: “Warfare will solely finish when individuals so understand its horrors [that] they like to chorus from combating even once they consider that they’ve a simply trigger.”

“The one street to a safe peace lies by way of a reform within the ideas and emotions of frequent males: an unwillingness to inflict humiliation on others for the sake of 1’s personal triumph, a extra calm and equable braveness which gives towards affordable dangers quietly, with out hostile feeling, and with out the nightmare terror that makes males rush into the very calamity of which they’re in dread.”

Each weekday at 1900 CET, Uncovering Europe brings you a European story that goes past the headlines. Obtain the Euronews app to get an alert for this and different breaking information. It is out there on Apple and Android gadgets.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here